Chloroquine resistance evolution in Plasmodium falciparum is mediated by the putative amino acid transporter AAT1
HomeHome > News > Chloroquine resistance evolution in Plasmodium falciparum is mediated by the putative amino acid transporter AAT1

Chloroquine resistance evolution in Plasmodium falciparum is mediated by the putative amino acid transporter AAT1

Jun 22, 2023

Nature Microbiology (2023)Cite this article

2422 Accesses

116 Altmetric

Metrics details

Malaria parasites break down host haemoglobin into peptides and amino acids in the digestive vacuole for export to the parasite cytoplasm for growth: interrupting this process is central to the mode of action of several antimalarial drugs. Mutations in the chloroquine (CQ) resistance transporter, pfcrt, located in the digestive vacuole membrane, confer CQ resistance in Plasmodium falciparum, and typically also affect parasite fitness. However, the role of other parasite loci in the evolution of CQ resistance is unclear. Here we use a combination of population genomics, genetic crosses and gene editing to demonstrate that a second vacuolar transporter plays a key role in both resistance and compensatory evolution. Longitudinal genomic analyses of the Gambian parasites revealed temporal signatures of selection on a putative amino acid transporter (pfaat1) variant S258L, which increased from 0% to 97% in frequency between 1984 and 2014 in parallel with the pfcrt1 K76T variant. Parasite genetic crosses then identified a chromosome 6 quantitative trait locus containing pfaat1 that is selected by CQ treatment. Gene editing demonstrated that pfaat1 S258L potentiates CQ resistance but at a cost of reduced fitness, while pfaat1 F313S, a common southeast Asian polymorphism, reduces CQ resistance while restoring fitness. Our analyses reveal hidden complexity in CQ resistance evolution, suggesting that pfaat1 may underlie regional differences in the dynamics of resistance evolution, and modulate parasite resistance or fitness by manipulating the balance between both amino acid and drug transport.

Drug resistance in microbial pathogens complicates control efforts. Therefore, understanding the genetic architecture and the complexity of resistance evolution is critical for resistance monitoring and the development of improved treatment strategies. In the case of malaria parasites, deployment of five classes of antimalarial drugs over the past half century have resulted in well-characterized hard and soft selective sweeps associated with drug resistance, with both worldwide dissemination and local origins of resistance driving drug resistance alleles across the range of Plasmodium falciparum1,2,3. Chloroquine (CQ) monotherapy had a central role in an ambitious plan to eradicate malaria in the last century. Resistance to CQ was first observed in 1957 in southeast Asia (SEA), and subsequently arrived and spread across Africa from the late 1970s, contributing to the end of this ambitious global eradication effort4.

Resistance to CQ has been studied intensively. The CQ resistance transporter gene (pfcrt, chromosome (chr.) 7) was originally identified using a P. falciparum genetic cross conducted between a CQ-resistant SEA parasite and a CQ-sensitive South American parasite generated in a chimpanzee host5,6. Twenty years of intensive research revealed the mechanistic role of the chloroquine resistance transporter (pfCRT) in drug resistance7,8, its location in the digestive vacuole membrane and its natural function transporting short peptides from the digestive vacuole into the cytoplasm9. CQ kills parasites by interfering with haemoglobin digestion in the digestive vacuole, preventing conversion of haem, a toxic by-product of haemoglobin digestion, into inert haemozoin crystals. Parasites carrying CQ resistance mutations at pfCRT transport CQ out of the food vacuole, away from the site of drug action7,8. The pfcrt K76T single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) is widely used as a molecular marker for CQ resistance10, while additional variants within pfcrt modulate levels of resistance to CQ11 and other quinoline drugs12, and determine associated fitness costs13. While mutations in a second transporter located in the food vacuole membrane, the multidrug resistance transporter (pfmdr1), have been shown to modulate CQ resistance in some genetic backgrounds14, the role of other genes in CQ resistance evolution remains unclear. In this Article, we sought to understand the contribution of additional parasite loci to CQ resistance evolution using a combination of population genomics, experimental genetic crosses and gene editing.

Longitudinal population genomic data can provide compelling evidence of the evolution of drug resistance loci15. We conducted a longitudinal whole genome sequence analysis of 600 P. falciparum genomes collected between 1984 and 2014 in Gambia to examine signatures of selection under drug pressure (Supplementary Table 1). Following filtration using genotype missingness (<10%) and minor allele frequency (>2%), we retained 16,385 biallelic SNP loci from 321 isolates (1984 (134), 1990 (13), 2001 (34), 2008 (75) and 2014 (65)). The pfcrt K76T mutation associated with CQ resistance increased from 0% in 1984 to 88% in 2014. Notably, there was also rapid allele frequency change on chr. 6: the strongest differentiation is seen at an S258L mutation in a putative amino acid transporter, pfaat1 (PF3D7_0629500, chr. 6), which increased during the same time period from 0% to 97% (Fig. 1a). Assuming a generation time (mosquito to mosquito) of 6 months for malaria parasites, these changes were driven by selection coefficients of 0.18 for pfaat1 S258L, and 0.11 for pfcrt K76T (Extended Data Fig. 1). Both pfaat1 S258L and pfcrt K76T mutations were absent in 1984 samples, but present in 1990, suggesting that they arose and spread in a short time window. Both pfaat1 and pfcrt showed similar temporal haplotype structures in Gambia (Extended Data Fig. 2). These were characterized by almost complete replacement of well-differentiated haplotypes at both loci between 1984 and 2014. During this period, we also observed major temporal changes in another known drug resistance locus (pfdhfr) (chr. 4)16 (Fig. 1b). That these rapid changes in allele frequency occur at pfcrt, pfaat1 and pfdhfr, but not elsewhere in the genome (Fig. 1b), provides unambiguous evidence for strong directional selection.

a, Temporal allele frequency change at SNPs coding for pfaat1 S258L and pfcrt K76T between 1984 and 2014. The map and expanded West African region show the location of Gambia. b, Significance of haplotype differentiation across temporal populations of P. falciparum parasites determined using hapFLK. P values were corrected for multiple testing using the BH method. Significance thresholds at −log10(false discovery rate (FDR)-corrected P value) of 5 are indicated with red dotted horizontal lines. Regions within the top 1% tail of FDR-corrected P values are marked with gene symbols. The strongest signals genome-wide seen are around pfcrt, pfaat1 and pfdhfr (which is involved in pyrimethamine resistance). c, IBD, quantified with the isoRelate (iR) statistic, for temporal populations sampled from Gambia. P values were corrected for multiple testing using the BH method. Significance thresholds at −log10(FDR-corrected P value) of 5 are indicated with red dotted horizontal lines. Regions within the top 1% tail of FDR-corrected P values are marked with gene symbols. Consistently high peaks of IBD around pfcrt and pfaat1 are seen for parasite populations in all years of sampling. The 1990 sample (n = 13) is not shown in c.

Source data

Further evidence of strong selection on pfaat1 and pfcrt came from the analysis of identity-by-descent (IBD) in Gambian parasite genomes. We saw the strongest signals of IBD in the genome around both pfaat1 and pfcrt (Fig. 1c). These signals are dramatic, because there is minimal IBD elsewhere in the genome, with the exception of a strong signal centring on pfdhfr after 2008. Interestingly, the strong IBD is observed in all four temporal samples examined including 1984, before the spread of either pfaat1 S258L or pfcrt K76T. However, only a single synonymous variant at pfaat1 (I552I) and none of the CQ-resistant associated mutant variants in pfcrt were present at that time. CQ was the first-line treatment across Africa from the 1950s. These results are consistent with the possibility of CQ-driven selective sweeps conferring low-level CQ resistance before 1984, perhaps targeting promotor regions of resistance-associated genes. pfaat1 has also been selected in other global locations: this is evident from prior population genomic analyses from Africa17, SEA18 and South America (SM)19. Plots summarizing IBD in these regions are provided in Extended Data Fig. 3.

Patterns of linkage disequilibrium (LD) provide further evidence for functional linkage between pfcrt and pfaat1. The strongest genome-wide signal of inter-chromosomal LD was found between these two loci both in our Gambian data (Supplementary Fig. 1) and in samples from across Africa20. LD between pfaat1 and pfcrt was strongest in 2001, and then decayed in 2008 and 2014 (Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2), consistent with maintenance of LD during intensive CQ usage, and subsequent LD decay after CQ monotherapy was replaced by sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine + CQ combinations in 2004, and then with artemisinin combinations in 2008 (ref. 16).

Correlations in allele frequencies are expected between pfcrt and pfaat1 if these loci are interacting or are co-selected. Frequencies of the CVIET haplotype for amino acids 72–76 in pfCRT are significantly correlated with allele frequencies of pfaat1 S258L in West Africa (WAF) (R2 = 0.65, P = 0.0017) and across all African populations (R2 = 0.44, P = 0.0021) (Extended Data Fig. 4). This analysis further strengthens the argument for co-evolution or epistasis between these two genes.

We examined the haplotype structure of pfaat1 from P. falciparum genomes (MalariaGEN release 6 (ref. 21)) (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table 2). The pfaat1 S258L SNP is at high frequency in SEA (58%) but is found on divergent flanking haplotypes suggesting an independent origin from the pfaat1 S258L in Gambia and elsewhere in Africa (Fig. 2c,d and Extended Data Fig. 5). Hendon et al.18 reached the same conclusion for the chr. 6 region using an IBD analysis of parasites from global locations. Convergent evolution of pfaat1 S258L provides further evidence for selection, and contrasts with pfcrt and pfdhfr, where resistance alleles that spread in Africa had an Asian origin1,2. The evolution of pfaat1is more complex in SEA than elsewhere in the world. There are three additional common derived amino acid changes in SEA. pfaat1 F313S has spread close to fixation in SEA (total 96%, FST = 0.91 compared with African samples) paired with pfaat1 S258L (55%), Q454E (15%) or K541N (22%). The pairing of F313S with three different mutations, suggests that F313S arose first. We speculate that these geographically localized pfaat1 haplotypes have had an important role in CQ resistance evolution in SEA and could also reflect geographic differences in the historical use of other quinoline drugs (mefloquine, quinine, piperaquine and lumefantrine) in this region22.

a, Global distribution of pfaat1 alleles. b, Comparable maps showing percentages of pfcrt haplotypes for amino acids 72–76. The coloured segments show the major pfcrt haplotypes varying at the K76T mutation. We used dataset from MalariaGEN release 6 for pfaat1 and pfcrt allele frequency analysis. Data used for the figure are contained in Supplementary Table 2. Only samples with monoclonal infections (N = 4,051) were included (1,233 from west Africa (WAF), 415 from east Africa (EAF), 170 from central Africa (CAF), 994 from east southeast Asia (ESEA), 998 from west southeast Asia (WSEA), 37 from south Asia (SA), 37 from south America (SM) and 167 from the Pacific Ocean region (PO)). c,d, MSNs of haplotypes coloured by pfaat1 allele (c) and geographical location (d), respectively. Networks were constructed from 50 kb genome regions centred by pfaat1 (25 kb up- and downstream. This spans the genome regions showing LD around pfaat1 (Supplementary Fig. 2). A total of 581 genomes with the highest sequence coverage were used to generate the network. The networks were generated on the basis of 1,847 SNPs (at least one mutant in the full dataset—MalariaGEN release 6). Circle size indicates number of samples represented (smallest, 1; largest, 87). Haplotypes from the same region (Asia or Africa) were clustered together, indicating independent origin of pfaat1 alleles.

P. falciparum genetic crosses can be achieved with human-liver chimaeric mice, reviving and enhancing this powerful tool for malaria genetics23,24, after use of great apes for research was banned. We used two independent biological replicates of a cross between the CQ-sensitive African parasite, 3D7, and a recently isolated CQ-resistant parasite from the Thailand–Myanmar border, NHP4026 (Supplementary Table 3). We then compared genome-wide allele frequencies in CQ-treated and control-treated progeny pools to identify quantitative trait loci (QTL) (Supplementary Table 4). This bulk segregant analysis (BSA)25 of progeny parasites robustly identified the chr. 7 locus containing pfcrt as expected, validating our approach (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Figs. 3 and 4). We were also intrigued to see a significant QTL on chr. 6 in each of the replicate crosses (Fig. 3, Supplementary Figs. 3 and 4 and Extended Data Fig. 6). We prioritized genes within the 95% confidence interval of each QTL (Supplementary Table 5) by inspecting the SNPs and indels that differentiated the two parents (Supplementary Table 6). The chr. 6 QTL spanned from 1,013 kb to 1,283 kb (270 kb) and contained 60 genes. Of these, 54 are expressed in blood stages, and 27 have non-synonymous mutations that differentiate 3D7 from NHP4026. pfaat1 was located at the peak of the chr. 6 QTL (Fig. 3c). NHP4026 carried two derived non-synonymous mutations in pfaat1 (S258L and F313S) compared with 3D7, which carries the ancestral allele. We thus hypothesized that one or both of these pfaat1 SNPs may be driving the chr. 6 QTL.

a, Allele frequency plots across the genome before and after CQ treatment. Lines with the same colour indicate results from technical replicates. b, QTLs identified using the G′ approach. Lines with the same colour indicate results from technical replicates. a and b include results from BSA with 48 h CQ treatment with samples collected at day 4. For the complete BSA from different collection timepoints and drug treatment duration under different CQ concentrations, see Supplementary Figs. 3 and 4. c, Fine mapping of the chr. 6 QTL. The 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated from the 250 nM CQ treated samples, including data from different collection time points (day 4 for 48 h CQ treatment and day 5 for 96 h CQ treatment), pools (pool 1 and pool 2), and drug treatment duration (48 h and 96 h). Light cyan shadow shows boundaries of the merged CIs of all the QTLs. Each line indicates one QTL; black dashed line indicates threshold for QTL detection (G′ = 20). The vertical red dashed line indicates pfaat1 location.

We isolated individual clones from the bulk 3D7 × NHP4026 F1 progeny to recover clones with all combinations of parental alleles at the chr. 6 and chr. 7 QTL loci. We cloned parasites both from a bulk progeny culture that was CQ selected (96 h at 250 nM CQ) and from a control culture. This generated 155 clonal progeny: 100 from the CQ-selected culture, 62 of which were genetically unique, and 55 from the untreated control culture, of which 47 were unique (Fig. 4a). We compared allele frequencies between these two progeny populations (Fig. 4b), revealing significant differences at both chr. 6 and chr. 7 QTL regions, paralleling the BSA results. We observed a dramatic depletion of the NHP4026 CQ-resistant allele at the chr. 7 QTL in control-treated cultures, consistent with strong selection against CQ resistant pfcrt alleles in the absence of CQ selection. Conversely, all progeny isolated after CQ treatment harboured the NHP4026 CQ-resistant pfcrt allele. The inheritance of the pfcrt locus (chr. 7) and the pfaat1 locus (chr. 6) was tightly linked in the isolated clones (Fig. 4c). To further examine whether the cross data were consistent with epistasis or co-selection, we examined a larger sample of recombinant clones isolated from five independent iterations of this genetic cross in the absence of CQ selection. This revealed significant under-representation of clones with genotype pfcrt 76T and pfaat1 258S/313F (WT) (Supplementary Table 7, χ2 = 12.295, P = 0.0005). These results are consistent with the strong LD between these loci observed in nature (Extended Data Fig. 4 and Supplementary Fig. 1)20 and suggest a functional relationship between the two loci. A role for pfaat1 S258L/F313S in compensating for the reduced fitness of parasites bearing pfcrt K76T is one likely explanation for the observed results.

a, Allelic inheritance of 109 unique recombinant progeny. Black and red blocks indicate alleles from 3D7 and NHP4026, separately. Vertical grey lines show non-core regions where no SNPs were genotyped. Left: clones isolated from recombinant progeny pools with or without CQ treatment are labelled. Right: pfaat1 and pfcrt alleles are labelled. WT indicates pfaat1 and pfcrt alleles from 3D7 and MUT indicates alleles from NHP4026. The location of pfaat1 and pfcrt is marked using black triangles on the top of the panel. b, Genome-wide 3D7 allele frequency plot of unique progeny cloned from pools after 96 h of CQ (250 nM) treatment (blue) or from control pools (gold). c, Linkage between loci on different chromosomes measured by Fisher's exact test. The dotted vertical line marks the Bonferroni-corrected significance threshold (one-tailed), while points shown in red are comparisons between SNPs flanking pfaat1 and pfcrt. Supplementary Table 7 shows non-random associations between genotypes in parasite clones recovered from untreated cultures.

We next measured in vitro CQ half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values for 18 parasites (a set of 16 progeny and both parents), carrying all combinations of the chr. 6 and chr. 7 QTL alleles (Supplementary Fig. 5 and Supplementary Table 8). The NHP4026 parent was the most CQ-resistant parasite tested. All progeny that inherited NHP4026 pfcrt showed a CQ-resistant phenotype while all progeny that inherited 3D7 pfcrt were CQ sensitive, consistent with previous reports. The effect of pfcrt alleles on parasite CQ resistance was significant on the basis of a two-way analysis of variance test (P = 7.52 × 10−11). We did not see an effect of the pfaat1 genotypes on IC50 values in clones carrying pfcrt 76T (P = 0.06) or pfcrt 76K (P = 0.19). This analysis has limited power because only two progeny parasites were recovered with pfaat1 258S/313F (WT) in combination with pfcrt 76T (Fig. 4a and Supplementary Fig. 5), but is consistent with the pfaat1 QTL being driven by parasite fitness in our genetic crosses. We therefore focused on gene manipulation of isogenic parasites for functional analysis.

We utilized CRISPR–Cas9 modification of the NHP4026 CQ-resistant parent to investigate the effects of mutations in pfaat1 on CQ IC50 drug response and parasite fitness (Fig. 5). NHP4026 pfaat1 carries the two most common SEA non-synonymous changes (S258L and F313S) (Fig. 2), relative to the sensitive 3D7 parent. We edited these positions back to the ancestral state both singly and in combination and confirmed the modifications in three to five clones isolated from independent edits for each allelic change (Fig. 5a). We then determined CQ IC50 values and measured fitness using pairwise competition experiments for parental NHP4026258L/313S, the single mutations NHP4026258L/313F, NHP4026258S/313S and the ancestral allele NHP4026258S/313F. This revealed a highly significant impact of the S258L mutation, which increased CQ IC50 values 1.5-fold, and a more moderate but significant impact of F313S and the double mutation (S258L/F313S), relative to the ancestral (258S/313F) allele (Fig. 5b). The observation that 258L shows reduced IC50 values in combination with the F313S mutation reveals an epistatic interaction between these amino acid variants (Fig. 5b).

a, CRISPR–Cas9 gene editing. Starting with the NHP4026 parent, we generated all combinations of the SNP-states at pfaat1. b, Drug response. Each dot indicates one replicate IC50 measurement: we used two to four independent CRISPR edited clones for each haplotype examined. The number of biological replicates is shown above the x axis. We conducted pairwise t-tests (two-tailed) to compare IC50 values between parasite lines, without adjustment for multiple comparisons. Haplotypes are shown on the x axis with derived amino acids shown in red. Bars show means ± s.e.m.), while significant differences between haplotypes are marked. c, Fitness. The bars show mean relative fitness (±1 s.e.m.) measured in replicated competition experiments, and dots represent fitness from individual measurements. We conducted three independent competition experiments for each edited parasite group in the absence of CQ. F-statistic was used to compare fitness between parasite lines. Results from assays for each edited group were combined using meta-analyses with random effects. For allele frequency changes for each competition experiment, see Extended Data Fig. 10. NS, not significant.

Source data

We also examined the effect of the S258L and F313S substitutions on responses to other quinoline drugs. The results revealed significant effects of pfaat1 substitutions on quinine, amodiaquine and lumefantrine IC50 responses, and no effect on the mefloquine IC50 (Extended Data Fig. 7). Notably, these IC50 value shifts were well below the threshold associated with clinical resistance. Consequently, although mutations in pfaat1 can subtly impact susceptibly to a range of compounds, these results are consistent with CQ treatment being the primary selective force that drove the pfaat1 S258L and F313S mutations along with those in pfcrt.

Mutations conferring drug resistance often carry fitness costs in the absence of drug treatment. We thus examined parasite fitness by conducting pairwise competition experiments with the parental NHP4026 parasite against the same mutant pfaat1 parasites created above. This revealed significant differences in fitness (Fig. 5c). The 258L/313F allele that showed a selective sweep in Gambia was the least fit of all genotypes, the ancestral allele (258S/313F) carried by the 3D7 parent was the most fit, while the 258S/313S mutation showed a similar fitness to the NHP4026 parent (258L/313S). These results also revealed strong epistatic interactions in fitness. While the 258L/313F allele that conferred high CQ IC50 values (Fig. 5b) carried a heavy fitness penalty (Fig. 5c), fitness was partially restored by the 313S mutation in the 258L/313S allele that predominates in SEA. Together these results show that the pfaat1 S258L substitution underpins a 1.5-fold increase in CQ resistance that probably drove its selective spread in Gambia. However, S258L carries a high fitness cost that in SEA parasites was probably mitigated by the substitution, F313S. Overall, these results demonstrate a large effect of pfaat1 mutations on fitness of parasites carrying pfcrt K76T resistance alleles.

The editing experiments reveal that clones carrying the ancestral pfaat1 allele in combination with pfcrt K76T show the highest fitness. By contrast, the close association of pfaat1 S258L/F313S with pfcrt K76T in progeny from the genetic crosses revealed the opposite relationship. We speculate that these opposing results may reflect differing selection pressures in blood stage parasites in the case of CRISPR experiments, or in the mosquito and liver stages of the life cycle in the case of genetic crosses. The gene editing studies were conducted with a single SEA parasite genotype (NHP4026). While African pfcrt CQR alleles originated in SEA and share a common ancestor and identity at amino acids 72–76, most SEA parasites (including NHP4026) carry one or two additional mutations in pfcrt (N326S and I356T) associated with higher CQ IC50 values and reduced fitness13,26. The predominant pfcrt haplotype in Gambia differs from NHP4026 at one amino acid, carrying the ancestral 326S, while NHP4026 carries the 326N mutation13. It will be important to examine the effect of pfaat1 mutations on African genetic backgrounds in future work.

To further understand how pfaat1 S258L impacts parasite phenotype, we used a yeast heterologous expression system. WT pfaat1 is expressed in the yeast plasma membrane27, where it increases quinine and CQ uptake conferring sensitivity to quinoline drugs, resulting in reduced growth. CQ uptake was previously shown to be competitively inhibited by the aromatic amino acid tryptophan, suggesting a role for pfaat1 in drug and amino acid transport27. We therefore expressed pfaat1 S258L in yeast, which restored yeast growth in the presence of high levels of CQ (Extended Data Fig. 8). Interestingly, expression of another amino acid variant (T162E), responsible for CQ resistance in rodent malaria parasites (Plasmodium chabaudi)28, also prevents accumulation of quinoline drugs within yeast cells and restores cell growth in the presence of 1 mM CQ27. Together, these new and published results suggest that yeast expression of pfaat1 mutations impact resistance and fitness by altering the rates of amino acid and quinoline transport.

We evaluated three-dimensional structural models based on the 3D7 PfAAT1 amino acid sequence using AlphaFold29 and I-TASSER30 (Extended Data Fig. 9). While pfCRT has 10 membrane-spanning helices31, pfAAT1 has 11; this was corroborated using the sequence-based membrane topology prediction tool TOPCONS32. The common pfAAT1 mutations S258L, F313S and Q454E are situated in membrane-spanning domains, while K541L is in a loop linking domains 9 and 10. The location of these high-frequency non-synonymous changes in membrane-spanning domains has strong parallels with pfCRT evolution31 and is consistent with a functional role for these amino acids in transporter function.

Identification of pfcrt as the major determinant of CQ resistance was a breakthrough that transformed the malaria drug resistance research landscape, but the contribution of additional genetic factors in the evolution and maintenance of CQ resistance remained unclear26,33. By combining longitudinal population genomic analysis spanning the emergence of CQ resistance in Gambia, analysis of bulk populations and progeny from controlled genetic crosses, and functional validation using both P. falciparum and yeast, we find compelling evidence that a second locus, pfaat1, has had an important role in CQ resistance evolution. This powerful combination of approaches allowed us to examine critical pfaat1 variants that contribute to the architecture of CQ resistance and interactions between pfcrt and pfaat1.

Our results provide compelling evidence that consolidates disparate observations from several systems suggesting a role for pfaat1 in drug resistance evolution. In the rodent malaria parasite P. chabaudi, a mutation (T162E) in the orthologous gene (pcaat1) was found to be a determinant of low-level CQ resistance in laboratory-evolved resistance28. In P. falciparum genome-wide association studies, the S258L mutation of pfaat1 was associated with CQ resistance in field isolates collected along the China–Myanmar border34, while pfcrt K76T and pfaat1 S258L show the strongest LD between physically unlinked chromosomes genome-wide20. In addition, mutations in pfaat1 have been linked to the in vitro evolution of resistance in P. falciparum to three different drug scaffolds35. Previous work identified strong signatures of recent selection in parasites in Africa at regions surrounding pfcrt, pfaat1 and other drug resistance loci16,17,36; similar signatures of selection are seen in Asia and SM18,19, while pfaat1 was highlighted in a list of P. falciparum genes showing extreme geographical differentiation21.

The different pfaat1 haplotypes in Africa and Asia may be partly responsible for the contrasting evolution of CQ resistance in these two continents. CQ-resistant parasites carrying both pfcrt K76T and pfaat1 S258L spread across Africa, but after removal of CQ as the first-line drug, the prevalence of CQ-resistant parasites declined in many countries37,38,39. This is consistent with the low fitness of parasites carrying pfcrt K76T and pfaat1 S258L in the absence of drug pressure, and intense competition within malaria parasite infection in Africa40.

In contrast, pfcrt K76T has remained at or near fixation in many SEA countries21,41 (Fig. 2). On the Thailand–Myanmar border, CQ resistance has remained at fixation since 1995, when CQ was removed as first-line treatment of P. falciparum malaria41. Our pfaat1 mutagenesis results demonstrate that parasites bearing pfaat1 258L/313S show reduced IC50 values but elevated fitness relative to pfaat1 258L/313F. We speculate that restoration of fitness by F313S may help to explain retention of CQ-resistant pfcrt K76T alleles in SEA. The alternative hypothesis—that high frequencies of F313S mutations are driven by widespread use of other quinoline partner drugs in SEA42—is not supported, because we see only minor impacts of this substitution on response to lumefantrine, quinine, mefloquine and amodiaquine (Extended Data Fig. 7).

Mutations in pfcrt confer CQ resistance by enabling efflux of CQ across the digestive vacuole membrane, away from its site of action8. pfAAT1 is also located in the digestive vacuole membrane35, where it probably acts as a bidirectional transporter of aromatic amino acids9,43. Given the structural similarity of quinoline drugs and aromatic amino acids, pfaat1 mutations may modulate the ability of pfAAT1 to transport CQ and/or amino acids27,43. The pfaat1 S258L mutation could potentiate resistance by either increasing efflux of CQ out of the digestive vacuole or reducing the rate of entry into the vacuole. Given that this pfaat1 mutation blocks entry of quinoline drugs into yeast cells when heterologously expressed in the yeast cell membrane27, we hypothesize that the pfaat1 S258L mutation reduces CQ uptake into the food vacuole (Fig. 6). Our mutagenesis analyses show that the S258L allele has a high fitness cost, perhaps due to a decreased capacity for amino acid transport from the vacuole. Interestingly, comparison of the pfaat1 S258L/F313S haplotype segregating in our genetic cross with the WT pfaat1 allele generated using gene editing revealed only marginal increases in IC50 values and limited reductions in fitness. This is consistent with the F313S mutation restoring the natural pfaat1 function of transporting amino acids, thereby reducing osmotic stress and starvation, while also partially reducing levels of CQ resistance (Fig. 6). That this haplotype has reached high frequency in SEA may contribute to the maintenance of pfcrt K76T alleles long after the removal of CQ as a first line drug. This model (Fig. 6) provides a working hypotheses that can be tested in future work examining the role of pfAAT1 and pfCRT.

pfCRT (red) and pfAAT1 (blue) are both situated in the digestive vacuole (DV) membrane. a, WT pfCRT and pfAAT1 transport peptides and aromatic amino acids, respectively, as well as CQ. b, pfCRT K76T exports CQ from the DV away from its site of action, leading to elevated resistance but transports peptides inefficiently leading to a loss of fitness. c, pfAAT1 S258L reduces entry of CQ into the DV, leading to elevated resistance, but amino acid flux is affected, leading to a loss of fitness. d, The pfAAT1 S258L/F313S double mutation increases CQ influx in comparison with the S258L alone but the amino acid transport function is restored, leading to reduced IC50 values and increased fitness in the absence of drug treatment.

Our results reveal hidden complexity in CQ resistance evolution: drug treatment has driven global selective sweeps acting on mutations in an additional transporter (pfAAT1) located in the P. falciparum digestive vacuole membrane, which fine tune the balance between nutrient and drug transport, revealing evidence for epistasis and compensation, and impacting both drug resistance and fitness.

The study was performed in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the US National Institutes of Health (NIH). The Seattle Children's Research Institute (SCRI) has an Assurance from the Public Health Service through the Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare for work approved by its Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. All of the work carried out in this study was specifically reviewed and approved by the SCRI Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

The project design is summarized in Supplementary Fig. 6. In brief, we use (1) population genomic analyses, (2) genetic crosses and quantitative genetics analysis followed by (3) functional analyses to investigate the role of additional loci in CQ resistance.

P. falciparum-infected blood samples collected from central (Farafenni) and coastal (Serrekunda) Gambia in 1984 and 2001, were processed for whole blood DNA and P. falciparum genomes and deep sequenced at the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute. Data from isolates collected from coastal Gambia in 2008 and 2014 had been published previously44,45 (Supplementary Table 1). Before sequencing, P. falciparum genomes were amplified from whole blood DNA of each sample from 1984 and 2001 using selective whole genome amplification (WGA) and then sequenced (paired-end reads) on the Illumina HiSeq platform46. Reads were mapped to the P. falciparum 3D7 reference genome using bwa mem (http://bio-bwa.sourceforge.net/). Mapping files (Binary Alignment Map) were sorted and deduplicated by Picard tools v2.0.1 (http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/), and SNP and indel were called with GATK HaplotypeCaller (https://software.broadinstitute.org/gatk/) following best practices (https://www.malariagen.net/data/pf3K-5). Variant call format (VCF) files were generated by chromosome, merged using bcftools (https://samtools.github.io/bcftools/bcftools.html) and filtered using vcftools (https://vcftools.sourceforge.net/). After filtration, only biallelic SNP variants with a VQSLOD score of ≥2, a map quality >30 and supported ≥5 reads per allelic variant were retained. SNPs with minor allele frequency <2% were removed from our analysis. We also removed samples with >10% genotypes missing. In the final dataset, there were in total 16,385 biallelic SNP loci and 321 isolates (1984 (134), 1990 (13), 2001 (34), 2008 (75) and 2014 (65)). The complexity of infection (monogenomic or polygenomic) was estimated as the inbreeding coefficient Fws from the merged VCF file using R package Biomix. The short-read sequence data analysed are listed in Supplementary Table 1.

For each sample with a complexity of infection greater than 1, the allele with most reads was retained for mixed-allele genotypes to create a virtual haploid genome variation dataset. Allele frequencies were calculated in plink, and pairwise differences between temporal populations and genetic clusters were estimated by Fst using Weir and Cockerham's method applied in the hierfstat package in R. The likelihood ratio test for allele frequency difference pFST was further calculated using vcflib. For a combined pFST P value, the fisher method was performed in R metaseq package. The summary P values were corrected for multiple testing using Benjamini–Hochberg (BH) method. To examine haplotype sharing at pfaat1 (Pf3D7_06_v3:1,213,102-1,217,313) and pfcrt (Pf3D7_07_v3:403222-406317) between isolates from the different years of sampling in Gambia, we extracted the IBD matrix using isoRelate R package18 for all pairs of isolates for gene regions spanning an additional 25 kb on each flank. We generated relatedness networks using the R package igraph following the scripts in the isoRelate R package18. Isolates are connected if they show >90% IBD.

We considered samples collected in the same year as a single population irrespective of the location of collection. We used the hapFLK approach to detect signatures of positive selection through haplotype differentiation following hierarchical clustering of Gambian temporal population groups compared with an outgroup from Tanzania, as previously described47. P values were computed for each SNP-specific value using the Python script provided with the hapFLK program, and values were corrected for multiple testing using the BH method. Secondly, we used pairwise relatedness based on identity by descent to derive an iR statistic for each SNP as implemented by the IsoRelate18 package in R. Regions with overlapping iR and hapFLK −log10 P values >5 were considered as regions of interest.

We included two datasets in this study: (1) genotypes of 7,000 worldwide P. falciparum samples from MalariaGEN Pf community project (version 6.0) (ref. 21). This dataset includes samples from south America (SM), west Africa (WAF), Central Africa (CAF), East Africa (EAF), South Asia (SA), the western part of southeast Asia (WSEA), the eastern part of southeast Asia (ESEA) and the Pacific Oceania (PO) region. (2) We also included 194 Thailand samples with whole genome sequencing data available from Cerqueira et al.15, and merged them into the WSEA population. Duplicate sequences were removed according to the sample's original ID (Hypercode). Only samples with single parasite infections (within-host diversity FWS > 0.90) and >50% of SNP loci genotyped were included for further analysis. A total of 4,051 samples remained after filtration (Supplementary Table 2). Non-biallelic SNPs and heterozygous variant calls were further removed from the dataset. We then extracted genotype data at pfaat1 and pfcrt gene regions and calculated the allele frequencies (Fig. 2a).

To minimize the effect of recombination, we extracted 1,847 SNPs distributed within 25 kb upstream and 25 kb downstream of the pfaat1 gene. Only samples with all 1,847 SNPs genotyped (581/4,051) were used for evolutionary analysis. To visualize the population structure, we calculated the pairwise genetic distance between samples and generated a minimum spanning network (MSN; Fig. 2b and Extended Data Fig. 5), using R package poppr. We compared genome sequences (PlasmoDB, version 46) between P. falciparum and Plasmodium reichenowi and extracted genotypes at 1,803/1,847 common loci. We then built an unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) tree rooted by P. reichenowi using the 581 haplotypes and 1,803 SNPs (Extended Data Fig. 5), using the R packages ape and phangorn under default parameters. MSN network and unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean tree were plotted with ggplot2.

We generated genetic crosses between parasite 3D7 and NHP4026 (ref. 48), using FRG NOD huHep mice with human chimaeric livers and Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes as described previously23,24,25,49,50. 3D7 is a parasite of African origin51 that has been maintained in the lab for decades and is CQ sensitive, while NHP4026 was cloned from a patient visiting the Shoklo Malaria Research Unit clinic on the Thailand–Myanmar border (2007) and is CQ resistant (Supplementary Table 3). We generated three recombinant pools using independent cages of infected mosquitoes: these are independent pools of recombinants48. The estimated number of recombinant genotypes in each pool was ~2,800 (ref. 48). We used two pools (pool 1 and pool 2) maintained in AlbuMAX-based culture medium for this study.

For each recombinant pool, the parasite culture was expanded under standard culture conditions25. Briefly, cultures were maintained in complete medium at 5% haematocrit in O+ red blood cells (RBCs) (Biochemed Services) at 37 °C, pH of 7.0–7.5, 5% CO2, 5% O2 and 90% N2. Medium changes were performed every 48 h and cultures were expanded to keep the parasitaemia at ~1%. Once expanded, each recombinant pool was divided into 16 0.5 ml aliquots while diluting to 1% parasitaemia. The aliquots were maintained in 48-well plates and treated with CQ (Supplementary Fig. 7). In total, we had 32 cultures: 2 pools × 4 CQ concentrations (0 (control), 50, 100 or 250 nM) × 2 drug duration time (48 h or 96 h) × 2 technical replicates. We define the day when drug was applied as day 0. After 2 days (48 h) of drug treatment, the infected RBCs were washed with phosphate-buffered saline solution twice to remove residual drug. For the plate assigned for 48 h CQ treatment (48-well plate 1), cultures were maintained in complete medium; and samples were collected at days 0, 4 and 7. For the plate assigned for 96 h CQ treatment (48-well plate 2), fresh CQ was added back to the culture medium and treated for another 48 h; and after a total of 96 h CQ treatment, drug was removed and samples were collected at days 0, 5 and 10. CQ was dissolved in H2O and diluted in incomplete medium (Gibco, Life Technologies). Culture medium was changed every 48 h. Parasitaemia was monitored using 20% Giemsa-stained slides, and cultures were diluted to 1% parasitaemia if the parasitaemia was higher than 1%. Approximately 15 μl packed RBCs was collected per sample.

We prepared Illumina libraries and sequenced both parents and the 96 segregant pools collected. We extracted genomic DNA using the Qiagen DNA mini kit and quantified DNA with Quant-iT PicoGreen Assay (Invitrogen). For samples with <50 ng DNA obtained, we performed WGA52. WGA products were cleaned with KAPA Pure Beads (Roche Molecular Systems) at a 1:1 ratio. We prepared sequencing libraries using 50–100 ng DNA or WGA product using KAPA HyperPlus Kit following the instructions with three cycles of PCR. All libraries were sequenced at 150 bp pair-end using Illumina Novaseq S4 or Hiseq X sequencers, to obtain >100× genome coverage per sample.

We mapped the sequencing reads against the 3D7 reference genome (PlasmoDB version 46) using BWA mem (http://bio-bwa.sourceforge.net/), and deduplicated and trans-formatted the alignment files using picard tools v2.0.1 (http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/). We recalibrated the base quality score based on a set of verified known variants53 using BaseRecalibrator, and called variants through HaplotypeCaller. Both functions were from Genome Analysis Toolkit GATK v3.7 (https://software.broadinstitute.org/gatk/). Only variants located in the core genome regions (defined in ref. 53) were called and used for further analysis.

We merged calls from the two parents using GenotypeGVCFs in GATK, and applied standard filtration to the raw variant dataset as described in ref. 54. We recalibrated the variant quality scores and removed loci with variant quality score <1. The final variants in VCF format were annotated using snpEff v4.3 (https://pcingola.github.io/SnpEff/) with 3D7 (PlasmoDB, release 46) as the reference. After filtration and annotation, we selected SNP loci that are distinct in the two parents and used those SNPs for further BSA.

We used statistical methods described in refs. 25,48,50 for BSA. The variant calls from segregant progeny pools were merged together. Additionally, SNP loci with coverage <30× were removed. We counted reads with genotypes of each parent and calculated allele frequencies. Allele frequencies of 3D7 were plotted across the genome, and outliers were removed following Hampel's rule55 with a window size of 100 loci. We performed the BSA using the R package QTLseqr56. Extreme QTLs were defined as regions with G′ > 20 (ref. 57). Once a QTL was detected, we calculated an approximate 95% confidence interval using Li's method58 to localize causative genes.

Individual progeny were cloned via limiting dilution at 0.3 cells per well from bulk cultures on day 10 after 96 h of control/250 nM CQ treatment. Individual wells with parasites were determined by qPCR (as previously described49) and expanded to larger cultures under standard culture conditions to obtain enough material for both cryopreservation and genome sequencing.

Cloned progeny were sequenced and genotyped as described in the ‘Genetic cross and BSA’ section, with these modifications: (1) the cloned progeny were sequenced at 25× genome coverage; (2) SNP calls were removed if the coverage was more than three reads per sample.

Unique recombinant progeny were identified from all cloned progeny using a previously described pipeline49. Non-clonal progeny were identified on the basis of the number and distribution of heterozygous SNP calls. Selfed progeny were identified as having greater than 90% sequence similarity to either parent. Unique recombinant progeny that were sampled multiple times were identified as clusters of individual clonal progeny with greater than 90% sequence similarity. We plotted frequencies of 3D7 alleles across the genome in progeny populations with and without CQ treatment. Heatmaps were generated to visualize inheritance patterns in individual unique recombinant progeny (Fig. 4a). We selected 16 unique recombinant progeny with different allele combination at chromosome 6 and chromosome 7 QTL regions for further CQ IC50 vvalues measurement (Supplementary Fig. 5).

Fisher's exact test was used to test for linkage between all inter-chromosomal pairs of loci across the set of 109 unique recombinant progeny. The distribution of the −log of the resulting P values were plotted in Fig. 4c, and the significance cut-off was calculated on the basis of a Bonferroni correction for the number of loci.

Cryopreserved stocks of 3D7, NHP4026, 3D7×NHP4026 progeny were thawed and grown in complete medium under standard culture conditions as described above. Cultures were kept below 3% parasitaemia with medium changes every 48 h. Parents and progeny IC50 values were assessed via a standard 72 h SYBR Green 1 fluorescence assay59. Cultures were assessed daily for parasitaemia and stage. Cultures that were at least 70% ring were loaded into CQ dose–response assays of a series of two-fold drug dilutions across ten wells at 0.15% parasitaemia. Drug stocks (1 mg ml−1) for CQ were prepared in H2O as single-use aliquots and stored at −20 °C until use. Drug dilutions were prepared in incomplete medium. Biological replicates were conducted with at least two cycles of culturing between load dates. IC50 values were calculated in GraphPad Prism 8 using a four-parameter curve from two technical replicates loaded per plate.

We designed plasmids for CRISPR–Cas9 editing as previously described60. The guide RNA (GAAATTAAATACATAAAAGA) was designed to target pfaat1 in NHP4026. Edits (258L/313F, 258S/313S and 258S/313F, Fig. 5a) were introduced to NHP4026 through homology arm sequence with target and shield mutations. Binding-site control mutants were not generated, as P. falciparum lacks error-prone non-homologous end joining61. The parasites were transfected at ring stages with 100 µg plasmid DNA, and successful transfectants were selected by treatment with 24 nM WR99210 (gift from Jacobus Pharmaceuticals) for 6 days. The parasites were recovered after ~3 weeks. To determine whether recovered parasites contained the expected mutations, we amplified the target region (forward primer, AGTACGGTACTTTTTATATGTACAGCT; reverse primer, TGCATTTGGTTGTTGAGAGAAGG) and confirmed the mutation with Sanger sequencing. We cloned parasites from successful transfection experiments: independent edited parasites (from different transfection experiments) were recovered for each pfaat1 genotype. Edited parasites were genome sequenced to identify off-target edits elsewhere in the genome. We were not able to find any SNP or indel changes between the original NHP4026 and any CRISPR-edited parasites other than the target and shield mutations.

Parasite IC50 values for CQ, amodiaquine, lumefantrine, mefloquine and quinine were measured for two to four clones per CRISPR–Cas9-modified line and for NHP4026 across multiple load dates as described above for cloned progeny, except that each plate included two NHP4026 technical replicates as controls. This replication of genotype within each load date allowed for detection of batch effects due to load date.

Analysis of variance was used to account for batch effects and to test for differences in IC50 values between all genotype groups and for each contrast between each CRISPR–Cas9-modified line and NHP4026 for each drug tested62. A linear model with load date (batch) and genotype as explanatory variables was utilized to generate batch-corrected IC50 values for visualization of the impact of CRISPRCas9 modifications (Fig. 5b and Extended Data Fig. 7).

Parasites were synchronized to late-stage schizonts using a density gradient63. The top layer of late-stage schizonts was removed and washed twice with Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) medium. Synchronized cultures were suspended in 5 ml of complete medium at 5% haematocrit and allowed to re-invade overnight with gentle shaking. Parasitaemia and parasite stage were quantified using flow cytometry. Briefly, 80 μl of culture and an RBC control were stained with SYBR Green I and SYTO 61 and measured on a Guava easyCyte HT (Luminex). A total of 50,000 events were recorded to determine relative parasitaemia and stage. When 80% of parasites were in the ring stage, the head-to-head competition experiments were set up64. Competition assays were set up between CRISPR–Cas9-edited parasites and NHP4026 in a 1:1 ratio at a parasitaemia of 1% in a 96-well plate (200 μl per well) and maintained for 30 days. Each of the assays contained three biological replicates (three independent clones from different CRISPR–Cas9 editing experiments) and two technical replicates (two wells of culture). Every 2 days, the parasitaemia was assessed by microscopy using Giemsa-stained slides, samples were taken and stored at −80 °C and the cultures were diluted to 1% parasitaemia with fresh RBCs and medium. The proportion of parasites in each competition (Extended Data Fig. 10) was measured using a rhAmp SNP Assay (Integrated DNA Technologies) with primers targeting the CRISPR–Cas9-edited region in pfaat1.

We measured selection coefficient (s) by fitting a linear model between the natural log of the allele ratio (freq (allele-edited parasite)/freq (NHP4026)) and time (measured in 48 h parasite asexual cycles). The slope of the linear model provides a measure of the driving s of each mutation65. To compare relative fitness of parasites carrying different pfaat1 alleles, we normalized the fitness of NHP4026 to 1 and used slope + 1 to quantify the fitness of CRISPR–Cas9-edited parasites (Fig. 5c).

To generate pfAAT1 expressing yeast, plasmid carrying the pfaat1 coding sequence was transformed into yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (BY4743) as previously described27. The doubling time (h) was measured for strains carry empty vector, WT pfAAT1 or S258L mutant pfAAT1. We measured doubling time under two culture conditions: control or with 1 mM CQ. Three independent experiments were performed for each assay.

Three-dimensional homology models for pfAAT1 were predicted using AlphaFold29,66 and I-TASSER30,67,68 and analysed with PyMol software (v2.3.0; Schrödinger, LLC). At the primary sequence level, we used TOPCONS32 to predict transmembrane helix topology for comparison. We plotted a cartoon version of the protein transmembrane topology based on the computationally predicted structures and membrane topology (Extended Data Fig. 9). Models were truncated to exclude amino-terminal residues 1–166, probably positioned outside of the membrane, because AlphaFold assigns low confidence to this N-terminal stretch. Furthermore, mutations of interest map only to transmembrane helices according to both 3D models and TOPCONS. I-TASSER generated models with topology similar to AlphaFold with the highest variations in AlphaFold low-confidence regions 1–166 and 475–516. The top five I-TASSER models superimpose on the AlphaFold model with a root mean square deviation range of 2.4–2.8 Å over 303–327 of 440 aligned residues using the PDBeFold Server (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/msd-srv/ssm). The four common SNPs (S258L, F313S, Q454E and K541L) overlay closely between the homology models. We evaluated the effect of different mutations on protein stability using the mutagenesis function in PyMol.

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

All raw sequencing data have been submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information Sequence Read Archive (SRA, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra) or European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) with accession numbers available in Supplementary Tables 1 and 2. All other data are available in the main text or supplementary materials. Source data are provided with this paper.

The code used in analysis and data analysed are available at GitHub through the following links: https://github.com/emilyli0325/CQ.AAT1.git (X.L.), https://github.com/MPB-mrcg?tab=repositories (A.A.-N.) and https://github.com/kbuttons/CQ.AAT1.progeny.git (K.A.B.-S.).

Wootton, J. C. et al. Genetic diversity and chloroquine selective sweeps in Plasmodium falciparum. Nature 418, 320–323 (2002).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Roper, C. et al. Intercontinental spread of pyrimethamine-resistant malaria. Science 305, 1124 (2004).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Ariey, F. et al. A molecular marker of artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Nature 505, 50–55 (2014).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Wellems, T. E. & Plowe, C. V. Chloroquine-resistant malaria. J. Infect. Dis. 184, 770–776 (2001).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Su, X., Kirkman, L. A., Fujioka, H. & Wellems, T. E. Complex polymorphisms in an approximately 330 kDa protein are linked to chloroquine-resistant P. falciparum in Southeast Asia and Africa. Cell 91, 593–603 (1997).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Wellems, T. E., Walker-Jonah, A. & Panton, L. J. Genetic mapping of the chloroquine-resistance locus on Plasmodium falciparum chromosome 7. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 88, 3382–3386 (1991).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Fidock, D. A. et al. Mutations in the P. falciparum digestive vacuole transmembrane protein PfCRT and evidence for their role in chloroquine resistance. Mol. Cell 6, 861–871 (2000).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Ecker, A., Lehane, A. M., Clain, J. & Fidock, D. A. PfCRT and its role in antimalarial drug resistance. Trends Parasitol. 28, 504–514 (2012).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Shafik, S. H. et al. The natural function of the malaria parasite's chloroquine resistance transporter. Nat. Commun. 11, 3922 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Djimde, A. et al. A molecular marker for chloroquine-resistant falciparum malaria. N. Engl. J. Med. 344, 257–263 (2001).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Pelleau, S. et al. Adaptive evolution of malaria parasites in French Guiana: reversal of chloroquine resistance by acquisition of a mutation in pfcrt. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 11672–11677 (2015).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Ross, L. S. et al. Emerging Southeast Asian PfCRT mutations confer Plasmodium falciparum resistance to the first-line antimalarial piperaquine. Nat. Commun. 9, 3314 (2018).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Dhingra, S. K. et al. Global spread of mutant PfCRT and its pleiotropic impact on Plasmodium falciparum multidrug resistance and fitness. mBio https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02731-18 (2019).

Shafik, S. H., Richards, S. N., Corry, B. & Martin, R. E. Mechanistic basis for multidrug resistance and collateral drug sensitivity conferred to the malaria parasite by polymorphisms in PfMDR1 and PfCRT. PLoS Biol. 20, e3001616 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Cerqueira, G. C. et al. Longitudinal genomic surveillance of Plasmodium falciparum malaria parasites reveals complex genomic architecture of emerging artemisinin resistance. Genome Biol. 18, 78 (2017).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Nwakanma, D. C. et al. Changes in malaria parasite drug resistance in an endemic population over a 25-year period with resulting genomic evidence of selection. J. Infect. Dis. 209, 1126–1135 (2014).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Amambua-Ngwa, A. et al. Major subpopulations of Plasmodium falciparum in sub-Saharan Africa. Science 365, 813–816 (2019).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Henden, L., Lee, S., Mueller, I., Barry, A. & Bahlo, M. Identity-by-descent analyses for measuring population dynamics and selection in recombining pathogens. PLoS Genet. 14, e1007279 (2018).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Carrasquilla, M. et al. Resolving drug selection and migration in an inbred South American Plasmodium falciparum population with identity-by-descent analysis. PLoS Pathog. 18, e1010993 (2022).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Band, G. et al. Malaria protection due to sickle haemoglobin depends on parasite genotype. Nature 602, 106–111 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

MalariaGen et al. An open dataset of Plasmodium falciparum genome variation in 7,000 worldwide samples. Wellcome Open Res. 6, 42 (2021).

Article PubMed Central Google Scholar

Martin, R. E., Shafik, S. H. & Richards, S. N. Mechanisms of resistance to the partner drugs of artemisinin in the malaria parasite. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 42, 71–80 (2018).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Vendrely, K. M., Kumar, S., Li, X. & Vaughan, A. M. Humanized mice and the rebirth of malaria genetic crosses. Trends Parasitol. 36, 850–863 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Vaughan, A. M. et al. Plasmodium falciparum genetic crosses in a humanized mouse model. Nat. Methods 12, 631–633 (2015).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Brenneman, K. V. et al. Optimizing bulk segregant analysis of drug resistance using Plasmodium falciparum genetic crosses conducted in humanized mice. iScience 25, 104095 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Callaghan, P. S., Hassett, M. R. & Roepe, P. D. Functional comparison of 45 naturally occurring isoforms of the Plasmodium falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter (PfCRT). Biochemistry 54, 5083–5094 (2015).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Tindall, S. M. et al. Heterologous expression of a novel drug transporter from the malaria parasite alters resistance to quinoline antimalarials. Sci. Rep. 8, 2464 (2018).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Modrzynska, K. K. et al. Quantitative genome re-sequencing defines multiple mutations conferring chloroquine resistance in rodent malaria. BMC Genomics 13, 106 (2012).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Yang, J. et al. The I-TASSER Suite: protein structure and function prediction. Nat. Methods 12, 7–8 (2015).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Kim, J. et al. Structure and drug resistance of the Plasmodium falciparum transporter PfCRT. Nature 576, 315–320 (2019).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Tsirigos, K. D., Peters, C., Shu, N., Kall, L. & Elofsson, A. The TOPCONS web server for consensus prediction of membrane protein topology and signal peptides. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, W401–W407 (2015).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Patel, J. J. et al. Chloroquine susceptibility and reversibility in a Plasmodium falciparum genetic cross. Mol. Microbiol. 78, 770–787 (2010).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Wang, Z. et al. Genome-wide association analysis identifies genetic loci associated with resistance to multiple antimalarials in Plasmodium falciparum from China–Myanmar border. Sci. Rep. 6, 33891 (2016).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Cowell, A. N. et al. Mapping the malaria parasite druggable genome by using in vitro evolution and chemogenomics. Science 359, 191–199 (2018).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Amambua-Ngwa, A. et al. SNP genotyping identifies new signatures of selection in a deep sample of West African Plasmodium falciparum malaria parasites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29, 3249–3253 (2012).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Laufer, M. K. et al. Return of chloroquine-susceptible falciparum malaria in Malawi was a reexpansion of diverse susceptible parasites. J. Infect. Dis. 202, 801–808 (2010).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Kublin, J. G. et al. Reemergence of chloroquine-sensitive Plasmodium falciparum malaria after cessation of chloroquine use in Malawi. J. Infect. Dis. 187, 1870–1875 (2003).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Mharakurwa, S. et al. Steep rebound of chloroquine-sensitive Plasmodium falciparum in Zimbabwe. J. Infect. Dis. 223, 306–309 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Anderson, T. J. et al. Microsatellite markers reveal a spectrum of population structures in the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17, 1467–1482 (2000).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Anderson, T. J. et al. Geographical distribution of selected and putatively neutral SNPs in Southeast Asian malaria parasites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22, 2362–2374 (2005).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Ashley, E. A. & Phyo, A. P. Drugs in development for malaria. Drugs 78, 861–879 (2018).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Martin, R. E. The transportome of the malaria parasite. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 95, 305–332 (2020).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Amambua-Ngwa, A. et al. Consistent signatures of selection from genomic analysis of pairs of temporal and spatial Plasmodium falciparum populations from The Gambia. Sci. Rep. 8, 9687 (2018).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Amambua-Ngwa, A. et al. Population genomic scan for candidate signatures of balancing selection to guide antigen characterization in malaria parasites. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002992 (2012).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Manske, M. et al. Analysis of Plasmodium falciparum diversity in natural infections by deep sequencing. Nature 487, 375–379 (2012).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Fariello, M. I., Boitard, S., Naya, H., SanCristobal, M. & Servin, B. Detecting signatures of selection through haplotype differentiation among hierarchically structured populations. Genetics 193, 929–941 (2013).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Kumar, S. et al. A malaria parasite cross reveals genetic determinants of Plasmodium falciparum growth in different culture media. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 12, 878496 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Button-Simons, K. A. et al. The power and promise of genetic mapping from Plasmodium falciparum crosses utilizing human liver-chimeric mice. Commun. Biol. 4, 734 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Li, X. et al. Genetic mapping of fitness determinants across the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum life cycle. PLoS Genet. 15, e1008453 (2019).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Uwimana, A. et al. Emergence and clonal expansion of in vitro artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum kelch13 R561H mutant parasites in Rwanda. Nat. Med. 26, 1602–1608 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Nair, S. et al. Single-cell genomics for dissection of complex malaria infections. Genome Res. 24, 1028–1038 (2014).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Miles, A. et al. Indels, structural variation, and recombination drive genomic diversity in Plasmodium falciparum. Genome Res. 26, 1288–1299 (2016).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

McDew-White, M. et al. Mode and tempo of microsatellite length change in a malaria parasite mutation accumulation experiment. Genome Biol. Evol. 11, 1971–1985 (2019).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Davies, L. & Gather, U. The identification of multiple outliers. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 88, 782–792 (1993).

Article Google Scholar

Mansfeld, B. N. & Grumet, R. QTLseqr: an R package for bulk segregant analysis with next-generation sequencing. Plant Genome https://doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome2018.01.0006 (2018).

Magwene, P. M., Willis, J. H. & Kelly, J. K. The statistics of bulk segregant analysis using next generation sequencing. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, e1002255 (2011).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Li, H. A quick method to calculate QTL confidence interval. J. Genet. 90, 355–360 (2011).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Rason, M. A., Randriantsoa, T., Andrianantenaina, H., Ratsimbasoa, A. & Menard, D. Performance and reliability of the SYBR Green I based assay for the routine monitoring of susceptibility of Plasmodium falciparum clinical isolates. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 102, 346–351 (2008).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Goswami, D. et al. A replication-competent late liver stage-attenuated human malaria parasite. JCI Insight https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.135589 (2020).

Lee, A. H., Symington, L. S. & Fidock, D. A. DNA repair mechanisms and their biological roles in the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 78, 469–486 (2014).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Taioli, E. et al. Application of reliability models to studies of biomarker validation. Environ. Health Perspect. 102, 306–309 (1994).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Davis, S. Z. et al. The extended recovery ring-stage survival assay provides a superior association with patient clearance half-life and increases throughput. Malar. J. 19, 54 (2020).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Tirrell, A. R. et al. Pairwise growth competitions identify relative fitness relationships among artemisinin resistant Plasmodium falciparum field isolates. Malar. J. 18, 295 (2019).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Dykhuizen, D. & Hartl, D. L. Selective neutrality of 6PGD allozymes in E. coli and the effects of genetic background. Genetics 96, 801–817 (1980).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Varadi, M. et al. AlphaFold Protein Structure Database: massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D439–D444 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Roy, A., Kucukural, A. & Zhang, Y. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nat. Protoc. 5, 725–738 (2010).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Zhang, Y. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 9, 40 (2008).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Van Tyne, D., Uboldi, A. D., Healer, J., Cowman, A. F. & Wirth, D. F. Modulation of PF10_0355 (MSPDBL2) alters Plasmodium falciparum response to antimalarial drugs. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57, 2937–2941 (2013).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Plowe, C. V. et al. Mutations in Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase and dihydropteroate synthase and epidemiologic patterns of pyrimethamine-sulfadoxine use and resistance. J. Infect. Dis. 176, 1590–1596 (1997).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Heinberg, A. & Kirkman, L. The molecular basis of antifolate resistance in Plasmodium falciparum: looking beyond point mutations. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1342, 10–18 (2015).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Ringwald, P., Bickii, J. & Basco, L. K. In vitro activity of antimalarials against clinical isolates of Plasmodium falciparum in Yaounde, Cameroon. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 55, 254–258 (1996).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Nzila, A., Okombo, J., Ohuma, E. & Al-Thukair, A. Update on the in vivo tolerance and in vitro reduced susceptibility to the antimalarial lumefantrine. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 67, 2309–2315 (2012).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

We thank past and present staff and visiting researchers at the MRC Unit in Gambia involved in studies from which samples were archived, including those under the earlier directorships of B. Greenwood and T. Corrah. Work at Texas Biomedical Research Institute was conducted in facilities constructed with support from Research Facilities Improvement Program grant C06 RR013556. Shoklo Malaria Research Unit is part of the Mahidol Oxford University Research Unit supported by the Wellcome Trust of Great Britain. We thank the staff of the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute Sample Logistics, Sequencing and Informatics facilities for their contributions. The Structural Biology Core at The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio is a part of Institutional Research Cores supported by the Office of the Vice President for Research, Greehey Children's Cancer Research Institute and the Mays Cancer Center Drug Discovery and Structural Biology Shared Resource (NIH grant P30 CA054174). Funding: NIH grant P01 12072248 (M.T.F.); NIH grant R37 AI048071 (T.J.C.A.); MRC Career Development Fellowship MC_EX_MR/K02440X/1 (A.A.-N.); MRC malaria program grant MC_EX_MR/J002364/1 (U.D.A.); European Research Council grant AdG-2011-294428 (D.C. and A.A.-N.); MRC grant MR/S009760/1 (D.C.); Wellcome Trust (206194 and 204911) and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1204628 and INV-001927) (D.K.); Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council grant BB/M022161/1 (S.V.A.); and Wellcome Trust (grant number 220221) (F.H.N.). For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright license to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.

These authors contributed equally: Alfred Amambua-Ngwa, Katrina A. Button-Simons, Xue Li, Sudhir Kumar, Katelyn Vendrely Brenneman.

MRC Unit The Gambia at London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Banjul, The Gambia

Alfred Amambua-Ngwa & Umberto D’Alessandro

Eck Institute for Global Health, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA

Katrina A. Button-Simons, Katelyn Vendrely Brenneman, Lisa A. Checkley, Douglas A. Shoue, Haley Dalhoff, James K. Larbalestier & Michael T. Ferdig

Disease Intervention and Prevention Program, Texas Biomedical Research Institute, San Antonio, TX, USA

Xue Li, Marco Ferrari, Marina McDew-White, Ann Reyes, Elizabeth Delgado & Timothy J. C. Anderson

Center for Global Infectious Disease Research, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA

Sudhir Kumar, Meseret T. Haile, Stefan H. I. Kappe & Ashley M. Vaughan

School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

Sarah M. Tindall & Simon V. Avery

Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK

Roberto Amato, Richard D. Pearson & Dominic Kwiatkowski

Department of Biochemistry & Structural Biology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, Antonio, TX, USA

Alexander B. Taylor

Shoklo Malaria Research Unit, Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Mahidol University, Mae Sot, Thailand

François H. Nosten

Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

François H. Nosten

Host Pathogen Interactions Program, Texas Biomedical Research Institute, San Antonio, TX, USA

Ian H. Cheeseman

Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

Stefan H. I. Kappe & Ashley M. Vaughan

Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

Stefan H. I. Kappe

Department of Infection Biology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

David J. Conway

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

A.A.-N., K.A.B.-S., X.L., S.K. and K.V.B. contributed equally to this work. Conceptualization: M.T.F., T.J.C.A., I.H.C., A.M.V., A.A.-N. and D.J.C. Methodology: A.M.V., S.K., S.V.A. and A.B.T. Investigation: A.A.-N., U.D., D.K., D.J.C., R.A., R.D.P., K.A.B.-S., K.V.B., M.M.-W., M.T.H., L.A.C., H.D., J.K.L., A.R., E.D., S.K., D.A.S., S.M.T., M.F., A.B.T. and T.J.C.A. Analysis: X.L., K.A.B.-S. and A.A.-N. Visualization: X.L., K.A.B.-S. and A.A.-N. Funding acquisition: M.T.F., T.J.C.A., D.J.C., A.A.-N., D.K., S.V.A. and F.H.N. Project administration: M.F., D.K., A.A.-N., D.J.C. and S.V.A. Supervision: M.F., A.M.V., T.J.C.A., I.H.C., S.H.I.K., S.V.A., D.K. and D.J.C. Writing—original draft: K.V.B., T.J.C.A., K.A.B.-S. and X.L. Writing—review and editing: M.T.F., A.M.V., I.H.C., S.K., A.A.-N., D.J.C., D.K., U.D., R.D.P., S.H.I.K., F.H.N., A.B.T. and T.J.C.A.

Correspondence to Ashley M. Vaughan, Michael T. Ferdig or Timothy J. C. Anderson.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Nature Microbiology thanks Liwang Cui, Carol Sibley and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher's note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

p is the frequency of mutant alleles (pfaat1 S258L or pfcrt K76T) as indicated in Fig. 1a, and q (=1-p) is the inferred frequency of wild-type (3D7) alleles. The x-axis indicates parasite generations (labeled with sample collection year). We estimated selection coefficients (s) based on allele frequency from year 1990 and 2001, as CQ monotherapy was stopped in Gambia in 2004. s indicates the changes in relative growth per parasite generation (that is the duration of the complete lifecycle in both mosquito and human host). The calculation was based on estimates of 2, 4, or 6 generations per year.

Haplotype relationships were based on Identity-by-Descent of genome segments encompassing 25 kb on either side of each gene (see methods). Haplotypes joined by lines indicate >90% IBD. Each point depicts an isolate with point colors representing the years from which they were sampled. Square points represent complex infections and circles represent monoclonals. MOI, multiplicity of infection.

Panels A-H show the proportion of pairs IBD plotted across the genome for parasites from different geographical regions (marked in the top left of each panel). For samples where >90% of the genomes are IBD, only one representative sample with the highest genotype rate was selected and used for IBD analysis. Sample numbers are shown in each panel. Chromosome boundaries are indicated with grey dashed vertical lines. The location of pfaat1 and pfcrt are indicated with red arrows on top of each panel. The chr 10 peak (West Africa, A) contains pfmspdbl2 associated with decreased sensitivity to halofantrine, mefloquine and lumefantrine69. The chr 8 peak (East Africa and Asia (C-H)) contains dihydropteroate synthase (sulfadoxine resistance)70 and the chr 12 peak (D-F) contains GTP cyclohydrolase I, a compensatory locus for antifolate drugs71. See also analyses by Amambua-Ngwa et al.17, Hendon et al.18, and Carrasquilla et al.19.

A. pfcrt allele distribution in African countries. B. pfaat1 allele distribution in African countries. C. Correlations in allele frequencies between pfcrt (CVIET) and pfaat1 (S258L). Frequencies of the CVIET haplotype for amino acids 72-76 in pfcrt are significantly correlated with allele frequencies of pfaat1 S258L in West Africa (R2 = 0.65, p = 0.0017, red dashed line) or across all African populations (R2 = 0.44, p = 0.0021). Point size indicates sample numbers, while color indicates sampling locations. We used t-test to establish if the Pearson's r statistic differs significantly from zero.

The tree was rooted with Plasmodium reichenowi (not shown in the tree). WAF: west Africa, EAF: east Africa, CAF: central Africa, SM: south America, ESEA: east Southeast (SE) Asia, SA: south Asia, WSEA: west SE Asia, PO: Pacific Ocean region.

Source data

CQ treatments were applied to the pools on day 0 at 0 (control), 50, 100, or 250 nM. CQ was removed on day 2 (48 hour treatment) or day 4 (96 hour treatment), as shaded with light blue. For 48 hour CQ treatments, samples were collected at day 0, 4, and 7; while for 96 hour CQ treatment, samples were collected at day 0, 5, and 10. Solid or dashed lines are results from different technical replicates. The 3D7 allele frequencies in CQ treated pools decrease at both chr.6 and chr.7 QTL regions. At the chr.14 QTL region, allele frequencies show no to little change following drug treatment, suggesting this QTL is unrelated to drug treatment.

CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing resulted in small differences in IC50 for quinine (QN), lumefantrine (LUM) and Amodiaquine (AMD), but no significant changes for mefloquine (MQ). However, all IC50's were below levels of clinical significance for these drugs (clinical thresholds: QN = 600 nM72; MQ = 30 nM72, AMD = 60 nM72), or at the lower end of the in vitro range (0-150 nM) in the case of LUM73. The number of biological replicates is shown above the x-axis. P values indicate significance levels and are based on two-way ANOVA analysis. Data are presented as mean values +/− SEM.

Source data

Yeast doubling time was calculated from the linear portion of exponential growth. Data was shown as means from 3 independent experiments ± SEM, and significance and was calculated according to multiple comparisons (with Turkey corrections) of two-way ANOVA. Growth of yeast cells expressing wild type pfaat1 (WT) is severely impacted by CQ treatment (1 mM CQ through the experiments) but is recovered in yeast expressing pfaat1 S258L. Published results demonstrate that AAT1 is expressed in the yeast cell membrane27, while pfAAT1 localizes to the digestive vacuolar membrane43, and may also be present in the plasma membrane35.

(A) AlphaFold model of PfAAT1 (left), representative I-TASSER model of PfAAT1 (center), structural superposition of the AlphaFold model (teal) and I-TASSER model (gray, right). TOPCONS transmembrane (TM) helix topology predictions are mapped onto the models in dark blue (left, center). AlphaFold and I-TASSER models align with a RMSD of 2.5 Å over 327 of 440 residues. Amino-terminal residues 1-166 were excluded from all models due to low confidence in structure prediction. (B) Detailed view of the mutations on the predicted PfAAT1 3-D structure using the AlphaFold model. The right view is related to the left by a 45° rotation about the axis looking down at the figure followed by a 90° rotation about the horizontal axis. The four SNPs shown as space-filling models are all arranged within a plane at one side of the model, perpendicular to the membrane. S258L (helix 3) and F313S (helix 5) are located opposite each other with helix 8 in between. Given the epistatic interactions between the PfAAT1 S258L and F313S SNPs evident from our functional analyses, the F313S substitution of the bulky, hydrophobic phenylalanine with the smaller, polar serine may compensate for a disruption in the transmembrane region that includes helices 3, 5, and 8 potentially allowing for partial restoration of predicted amino acid transport activity. Q454E is located on helix 8 near the TM surface and K541N is located in a loop connecting helix 9 and 10. (C) Topology of PfAAT1 inferred using 3D structure. There are eleven transmembrane (TM) helices. Three of the mutations are located at the TM helices, while K541N is located at a loop connecting helix 9 and 10. The color scheme matches the schematic in Panel B. The blue triangle indicates amino-terminal residues 1-166 that were excluded from structure prediction.

We used three independent CRISPR/Cas9 edited clones for each genotype, and two technical replicates for each competition experiment (average values plotted).

Supplementary Figs. 1–7.

Supplementary Table 1. Accession numbers, sample IDs and alleles for the Gambian samples at pfaat1 codon 258 and pfcrt codon 76, respectively. Supplementary Table 2. Samples used in pfaat1 allele and evolution study. Supplementary Table 3. Summary of parental parasite genotypes. Supplementary Table 4. Information and accession numbers for cross samples. Supplementary Table 5. Genes inside of the QTL regions. Supplementary Table 6. SNPs and indels inside of the chr.6 QTL regions. Supplementary Table 7. Unique recombinant progeny from genetic cross 3D7 × NHP4026 without CQ selection. Supplementary Table 8. CQ IC50 data for select progeny.

Allele count and mutant proportions per year of sampling in Gambia for codons pfaat1 258 and pfcrt 76. IC50 data for CRISPR/Cas9-edited parasite. Amodiaquine, mefloquine, lumefantrine and quinine IC50 data for CRISPR/Cas9-edited parasites. Cell-doubling times (h), triplicate determinations.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

Amambua-Ngwa, A., Button-Simons, K.A., Li, X. et al. Chloroquine resistance evolution in Plasmodium falciparum is mediated by the putative amino acid transporter AAT1. Nat Microbiol (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-023-01377-z

Download citation

Received: 26 July 2022

Accepted: 29 March 2023

Published: 11 May 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-023-01377-z

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative